Moral luck Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1250 words

Moral component - Essay ExampleConcepcion (2002) describes the standard view of indebtedness whereby it is unjust to hold a somebody morally responsible for that which she did not control. Agents deserve to be morally appraised or held liable only for that which they controlled (455). The problem this poses is that at some level it stick out always be argued that a situation was outside of a psyches control. There will invariably be some robustious factor that, when joining the confluence of other factors over which a person did have control, it can be argued was the cause of any given scenario.For example, if a person driving a vehicle strikes a pincer who suddenly runs into the road, it might be argued that the person could have been paying closer attention and thereby braked sooner, or should have been driving more slowly. On the other hand it could be argued that a reasonable person under the circumstances could not have predicted the child running into the road, and ther efore this was just bad bunch and the driver should not be held responsible. This epitomizes the concept of moral luck. To what extend does a random, uncontrollable occurrence pacify a person of moral responsibility for a harm doneConcepcion goes on to argue that evaluate the standard view of responsibility is tantamount t... never morally responsible, show that luck is not ubiquitous or at least that ubiquitous luck is not moral, or show that ascriptions of responsibility can retain justice despite the omnipresence of luck (455). The implication is that it does not make sense to avoid assigning responsibility simply because luck played a role in the moral dilemma, since luck will virtually always be a factor to some degree. This would logically mean that zippo is ever morally responsible for anything. Paradox of Moral Luck and Moral ResponsibilityThe paradox, as doubting Thomas Nagel (1979) describes it, is that individual moral responsibility is possible even though luck is u biquitous. We hold a person responsible for actions taken within a scenario he/she did not bring about. It is possible for a person to be morally blameworthy even though the bulk of the circumstances bringing about a scenario were entirely outside of that persons control. Degrees of control are virtually irrelevant, as proximate causation of uncontrollable variables fails to crack any relief from a persons moral responsibility for actions taken within any given situation. tump over the case of a soldier who voluntarily enlists in the U.S. Marine Corps in the hopes of being deployed in Iraq to fight in the war on terror. This person, after months of grueling patrols in Baghdad watching his boyfriend marines get killed by improvised explosive devices, decides to take revenge by entering the nearest civil residence and shooting up the women and children inside. Then consider the kid who had his sights set on college but was alternatively drafted into the U.S. Army during the Vietnam War and becomes so worn down by the war and numbed to killing that he partakes in a massacre of civilians at Mai Lai. The former soldier chose to