Leadership Factors Assignment Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 750 words

Leadership Factors - Assignment ExampleI do not believe that the authentic leadership questionnaire is really valid because the answers are too subjective to earmark a real understanding of ones leadership style. Description of My Scores My scores on the Authentic Leadership Self-Assessment Questionnaire (ALSAQ) are as follows Self-awareness, 13 Internalized honourable perspective 17 Balanced processing, 10 Relational transparency 10 with a total of 50. According to Northouse (2013) all of these scores project weakness as an authentic leader when tallied case-by-casely. However, when the scores are added together, the final score falls within the high school range (Walumbwa and Associates, 2012). When I look at these scores individually and the questions that were added together to create the score, I fecal matternot set up that these scores represent me or anyone as an authentic leader. According to Tobias (2011) the area of self-awareness is to measure the personal insights that a leader has and whether they understand their strengths and weaknesses. I scored a 13 in this area but I apprehension this was not a good indication of my ability. As an example, one of the fleshs that determined this measure was number nine which read, I seek feedback as a way of understanding who I really am as a person. If someone seeks feedback from others to know who they are, I would say this is a weak leader. I give tongue to this would not describe me at all. In the next section, internalized moral perspective, Tobias (2011) states that this section measures an individuals moral code and values. It also tells whether an individual has their own wangle or is controlled by others. I anticipate by my own moral code and I do not allow other people to control how I act or react to situations. I believe this is a better way to live than to have someone else tell you what to do. Tobias (2011) states that the third category, balanced processing, measures critical consid ering and the ability to take in information and make decisions after listening to other peoples opinions. Again, I designate this is not a true measure of a person. I think it is better to stick to your own caprices, winning other people into consideration, but you must make the decision eventually. Welch and Welch (2012) say that being authentic shows that the individual is likable. I think this is true. People who are open and honest as far as they can be, are people who can be trusted. But, this is a perception and not necessarily a human beings because it is based on how someone perceives someone else. Tobias (2011) states that he final section, relational transparency, measures how the leader perishs with others and expects that they will communicate openly and honestly. I scored a 10 on this section. I believe that I communicate salubrious with others, but if I were leading a team, I would not reveal everything about myself to that team. I think that one can be authenti c without telling all the details of their life. Implications of the Scores for My Effectiveness as a Leader I do not think these scores really give an idea of how I would be as a leader. The scores are subjective, which means that I could change my judgment about some of the scores and get a better score in the end. I think that these types of scores are like taking any personality essay or romance quiz that one can find on the Internet. Nothouse (2013) states that this test has not had enough empirical evidence to show that it is valid. I would not take this test seriously if I wanted to know how I would be as